Determinants of Georgia’s Foreign Trade With 3+3 Format Countries

Keywords: Georgia, 3 3 Format Countries, Foreign Trade, Panel Gravity Model.

Imeda Paksadze

Batumi Navigation University

Batumi, Georgia

orcid-og-image4.pnghttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3772-9308

 

Ali Riza Sandalcilar

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University

Rize, Türkiye

orcid-og-image4.pnghttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9185-6968

 

ABSTRACT

 

This study examines the economic dimension of the 3+3 initiative, which emerged in the South Caucasus after 2020, by analyzing Georgia’s foreign trade relations. As part of broader regional cooperation and integration efforts, this framework has the potential to reshape Georgia’s trade orientation and regional economic ties. Against this background, the study seeks to address a gap in the literature by identifying the determinants of Georgia’s foreign trade flows using a panel gravity model.

The empirical findings indicate that the main determinants of Georgia’s foreign trade are economic size and shared borders. In the export models, the distance variable is negative and statistically significant, confirming that greater geographical distance increases trade costs. In contrast, distance and partner-country GDP are statistically insignificant in the import models, suggesting that imports are driven primarily by Georgia’s domestic demand. The common religion variable is negative and significant in most models, indicating that cultural proximity does not have the expected positive effect on trade. Likewise, free trade agreements exhibit limited or statistically insignificant effects.

Overall, the results suggest that economic size and geographical proximity are the primary drivers of Georgia’s foreign trade, while cultural and institutional factors play a more limited role. The findings highlight the importance of strengthening trade relations with neighboring countries and maximizing the benefits of economic growth. They also emphasize the need to support Georgia’s trade policy through infrastructure investment, improved border-crossing procedures, and more effective implementation of free trade agreements

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baier, S. L., and J. H. Bergstrand. 2007. “Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members’ International Trade?” Journal of International Economics 71, no. 1: 72–95.
Belkania, B (2021), The Platform of the 3+3 Format: A Revıew. Georgian Foundation for Strategic And International Studies.
Carrère, C. (2006) ‘Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model’, European Economic Review, 50(2), pp. 223-247.
CAUCASUS WATCH (2025), 3+3 Initiative as a New Order in the South Caucasus. (Erişim: https://caucasuswatch.de/)
DAILY SABAH. (2021) Russia offers 3+3 format Caucasus regional platform. (Erişim: https://www.dailysabah.com/)
Demir, M. A. (2020). Türkiyenin İhracat Ve İthalat Kompozisyonunun Diş Ticaret Dengesi Üzerine Etkisi: AB-15 Ülkeleri İçin İki Yönlü Panel Analizi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(44), 887-909.
Golovko, A. (2009). Çekim Modeli: Avrasya Ülkelerinin Dış Ticareti, EconAnadolu 2009: Anadolu Uluslararası İktisat Kongresi, 17-19, Eskişehir.
Helble, M. & Mann, C. Wilson, J. (2012): Aid-for-trade facilitation. Review of World Economics. 148 (2), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-011-0115-9
Kazancı, B. A. (2025). Türk Devletleri Teşkilatının Türkiye İhracatına Etkisinin Çekim Modeli ile Analizi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (56), 232-246.
MFA (2024), 3+3 Güney Kafkasya Bölgesel İşbirliği Platformunun Üçüncü Toplantısı. (Erişim: https://www.mfa.gov.tr/)
Ozcan, B., & Ozturk, I. (2019). Renewable energy consumption-economic growth nexus in emerging countries: A bootstrap panel causality test. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 104, 30-37.
Pöyhönen, Pentti. (1963). A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade Between Countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 90, 23-40.
Ravenstein, E. G. (1889). The Law Of Migration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 52(2), 241-305
Sandalcılar, A. R., Ayran Cihan, K., & Çolak, Y. (2022). Türkiye’nin N11 Ülkeleriyle Olan Diş Ticaretinin Belirleyicileri: Çekim Modeli Yaklaşimi. Uluslararası Ekonomi İşletme Ve Politika Dergisi, 6(1), 59-78. https://doi.org/10.29216/ueip.1078923
Tinbergen, J. (1962). Economic Policy: Principles and Design. Rotterdam: North Holland Press.TOPCHUBASASHOV CENTER (2025), Time for 3 in South Caucasus. (Erişim: https://top-center.org/)
Yılmaz, U. M. (2021). International trade between Turkey and Latin American countries
Published
2026-08-26