PREFERRED WORK ARRANGEMENTS AND CAREER ADVANCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN REMOTE WORKING CONDITIONS - ANALYSIS IN DEMOGRAPHIC TERMS

  • EKA MAGHLAPERIDZE
Keywords: Remote work, work arrangement, demographic factors, career advancement

EKA MAGHLAPERIDZE

PhD Student

Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University

E-mail: emaghlaperidze@gmail.com

orcid-og-image4.pnghttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-2126-4369

Abstract

Remote work is quite popular across the globe, however, it became especially relevant during the Covid-19 pandemic lockdown, when the vast majority of companies were forced to switch employees to remote work mode. Therefore, we find it interesting to examine the consequences of remote working and employee attitudes towards it.

People employed at licensed insurance companies in Georgia were selected to participate in the study. The aim of the study was to identify the preferred work arrangement (working from home, working from the office, part-time remote working) while working remotely under the influence of demographic factors (gender, age, education, marital status). Also, the aim of the study was to study how people working remotely perceive their career advancement opportunities and what are the impacts of work experience and job position in the company on issues related to remote work. Findings of the study and the recommendations can be critically useful for many different companies in order to successfully implement the remote working model and achieve the maximum efficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nilles, J. M. (1994). Making telecommuting happen: a guide for telemanagers and telecommuters. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Belanger, F., & Collins, R. W. (1998). Distributed work arrangements: A research framework. Information Society(14), 137-152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/019722498128935

Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology(92), 1524-1541. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524

Global Workplace Analytics. (2020, March 13). Latest Work-At-Home/Telecommuting/Mobile Work/Remote Work Statistics. Retrieved February 20, 2021, from https://globalworkplaceanalytics.com/telecommuting-statistics

PwC United States. (2020, June 25). US Remote Work Survey. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from pwc.com: https://www.pwc.com/us/en/library/covid-19/us-remote-work-survey.html

Hamilton, E. (2002). Bringing work home: Advantages and challenges of telecommuting. Boston: The center for Work & Family, Boston College, Carrol School of Management. Retrieved February 20, 2021, from file:///C:/Users/admin/Downloads/Bringing%20Work%20Home_Telecommuting.pdf

Nickson, D., & Siddons, S. (2011). Remote Working Linking people and organizations. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Buffer and AngelList. (2020). The 2020 State of Remote Work. Retrieved February 22, 2021, from https://lp.buffer.com/state-of-remote-work-2020

Owl Labs, Global Workplace Analytics. (2019, September). State of Remote Work. Retrieved February 20, 2021, from https://www.owllabs.com/state-of-remote-work/2019

Ipsos. (2012, January 23). The World of Work: Global Study of Online Employees Shows One in Five (17%) Work from Elsewhere. Retrieved March 20, 2021, from https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/world-work-global-study-online-employees-shows-one-five-17-work-elsewhere

Kharadze, N., Paichadze, N., & Pharesashvili, N. (2019). General Trends of Business Career Management. European Journal of Economics and Business Studies, 153-177. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.26417/ejes.v5i1.p153-177

Published
2021-06-04