INNOVATION IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT: LESSONS LEARNED FROM SUCCESSFUL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES IN VARIOUS INDUSTRIES
Ruslan Sayed
E-mail: ruslan.Sayed@gmail.com
Sc in Management GfK Company Riyadh
Saudi Arabia
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3854-394X
Abstract: In the ever-evolving landscape of project management, the imperative to innovate stands as a cornerstone for organizations seeking sustained success and competitive advantage. This research presents a comprehensive exploration into the intricacies of innovation within project management frameworks, focusing on deriving lessons from successful business development initiatives spanning diverse industries and regions. By unraveling the multifaceted dynamics that underpin these successes, the study transcends traditional project management paradigms.
The research objectives encompass a nuanced analysis of sector-specific innovation drivers, the impact of cross-functional collaboration, the efficacy of risk management strategies, quantification of financial outcomes and temporal efficiency, and a deep understanding of stakeholder satisfaction. Through a meticulous examination of initiatives in technology, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and South America, the study provides actionable insights for organizations navigating the unique challenges of their respective industries.
Practically, this research offers organizations a roadmap for tailoring project management strategies to industry-specific demands. It emphasizes cross-functional collaboration as a transformative catalyst for innovation and advocates for adaptive risk management strategies in dynamic project environments. Quantifiable benchmarks for financial success and temporal efficiency, coupled with an exploration of qualitative dimensions in stakeholder satisfaction, provide a holistic framework for project evaluation and optimization.
Theoretical contributions include challenging existing frameworks with sector-specific analyses, enriching the understanding of collaboration dynamics, advocating for adaptive risk management, and contributing to the discourse on the symbiotic relationship between financial success and project timelines. Future research possibilities include longitudinal studies, in-depth examinations of collaborative tools, and investigations into industry-specific innovation ecosystems. This research not only illuminates the current state of project management excellence but also guides future strategies and contributes substantively to the ongoing discourse on organizational innovation
Downloads
References
2. Andries, P., & Hünermund, P. (2020). Firm-level effects of staged investments in innovation: The moderating role of resource availability. Research Policy, 49(7), 103994.
3. Amarlou, A., & Coccia, M. (2023). Estimation of diffusion modeling of unhealthy nanoparticles by using natural and safe microparticles. Nanochemistry Research, 8(2), 117-121. doi: 10.22036/ncr.2023.02.004
4. Ansari, S. S., Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2016). The disruptor’s dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. Television ecosystem. Strategic Management Journal, 37(9), 1829–1853.
5. Argyris, C. (1976). Single-Loop and Double-Loop Models in Research on Decision Making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391848
6. Ardito, L., Coccia, M., & Messeni Petruzzelli, A. (2021). Technological exaptation and crisis management: Evidence from COVID-19 outbreaks. R&D Management, 51(4), 381-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12455
7. Azoulay, P., Zivin, J. S., & Manso, G. (2011). Incentives and creativity: Evidence from the academic life sciences. RAND Journal of Economics, 42(3), 527–554.
8. Azoulay, P., & Lerner, J. (2012). Technological innovation and organizations. In R. Gibbons and J. Roberts (Eds.), The Handbook of Organizational Economics (pp. 575–603). Princeton University Press.
9. Bergemann, D., & Hege, U. (1998). Venture capital financing, moral hazard, and learning. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(6-8), 703–735.
10. Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J. (2007). Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4), 1351–1408.
11. Bloom, N., Eifert, B., Mahajan, A., McKenzie, D., & Roberts, J. (2013). Does management matter? Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(1), 1–51.
12. Calleam. (2023). Why Do Projects Fail? A resource for organizational learning focused on improving project success rates. Boeing 737-MAX. Calleam Consulting Ltd.
13. Cannon, M. D., & Edmondson, A. C. (2005). Failing to Learn and Learning to Fail (Intelligently): How Great Organizations Put Failure to Work to Innovate and Improve. Long Range Planning: International Journal of Strategic Management, 38(3), 299–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2005.04.005
14. Casey, G. W. (2015). Assessing War: The Challenge of Measuring Success and Failure (L. J. Blanken, H. Rothstein, & J. J. Lepore, Eds.). Georgetown University Press.
15. Celikmih, K., Inan, O., & Uguz, H. (2020). Failure Prediction of Aircraft Equipment Using Machine Learning with a Hybrid Data Preparation Method. Scientific Programming, Article ID 8616039. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8616039
16. Coccia, M. (2017). New directions in measurement of economic growth, development and underdevelopment. Journal of Economics and Political Economy, 4(4), 382-395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jepe.v4i4.1533
17. Cooper, R. G. (1988). The new product process: A decision guide for management. Journal of Marketing Management, 3(3), 238–255.
18. Cornelli, F., & Yosha, O. (2003). Stage financing and the role of convertible securities. Review of Economic Studies, 70(1), 1–32.
19. Crowley, F., & Jordan, D. (2017). Does more competition increase business-level innovation? Evidence from domestically focused firms in emerging economies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26(5), 477–488.
20. Dahiya, S., & Ray, K. (2012). Staged investments in entrepreneurial financing. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(5), 1193–1216.
21. D’Este, P., Amara, N., & Olmos-Peñuela, J. (2016). Fostering novelty while reducing failure: Balancing the twin challenges of product innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113, 280–292.
22. Doran, J., & Ryan, G. (2014). Firms’ skills as drivers of radical and incremental innovation. Economics Letters, 125(1), 107–109.
23. Ederer, F., & Manso, G. (2013). Is pay for performance detrimental to innovation? Management Science, 59(7), 1496–1513.
24. Fichman, R. G., Keil, M., & Tiwana, A. (2005). Beyond valuation: “Options thinking” in IT project management. California Management Review, 47(2), 74–96.
25. Gompers, P. A. (1995). Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1461–1489.
26. Haneda, S., & Ono, A. (2022). R&D management practices and innovation: Evidence from a firm survey. Springer Briefs in Economics.
27. Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1994). A theory of debt based on the inalienability of human capital. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4), 841–879.
28. Kambayashi, R., Ohyama, A., & Hori, N. (2021). Management practices and productivity in Japan: Evidence from six industries in JP MOPS. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 61, 101152.
29. Kaplan, S. N., & Strömberg, P. (2001). Venture capitalists as principals: Contracting, screening, and monitoring. American Economic Review, 91(2), 426–430.
30. Kaplan, S. N., & Strömberg, P. (2003). Financial contracting theory meets the real world: An empirical analysis of venture capital contracts. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 281–315.
31. Kaplan, S. N., & Strömberg, P. (2004). Characteristics, contracts, and actions: Evidence from venture capitalist analyses. Journal of Finance, 59(5), 2177–2210.
32. Klingebiel, R., & Adner, R. (2015). Real options logic revisited: The performance effects of alternative resource allocation regimes. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 221–241.
33. Klingebiel, R., & Rammer, C. (2014). Resource allocation strategy for innovation portfolio management. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), 246–268.
34. Lenfle, S., & Loch, C. (2010). Lost roots: How project management came to emphasize control over flexibility and novelty. California Management Review, 53(1), 32–55.
35. Manso, G. (2011). Motivating innovation. Journal of Finance, 66(5), 1823–1860.
36. Mao, Y., Tian, X., & Yu, X. (2014). Unleashing innovation. Kelley School of Business Research Paper No. 2014-43.
37. Mohnen, P., Mairesse, J., & Dagenais, M. (2006). Innovativity: A comparison across seven European countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(4–5), 391–413.
38. Neher, D. V. (1999). Staged financing: An agency perspective. Review of Economic Studies, 66(2), 255–274.
39. Ray, K. (2007). Performance evaluations and efficient sorting. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(4), 839–882.
40. Reeb, D. M., & Zhao, W. (2022). Disregarding the shoulders of giants: Inferences from innovation research. Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 11(4), 923–964.
41. Roberts, K., & Weitzman, M. L. (1981). Funding criteria for research, development, and exploration projects. Econometrica, 49(5), 1261–1288.
42. Robin, S., & Schubert, T. (2013). Cooperation with public research institutions and success in innovation: Evidence from France and Germany. Research Policy, 42(1), 149–166.
43. Rodriguez, M., Doloreux, D., & Shearmur, R. (2017). Variety in external knowledge sourcing and innovation novelty: Evidence from the KIBS sector in Spain. Technovation, 68, 35–43.
44. Sahlman, W. A. (1988). Aspects of financial contracting in venture capital. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1(2), 23–36.
45. Sahlman, W. A. (1990). The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 473–521.
46. Schultz, C., Globocnik, D., Kock, A., & Salomo, S. (2019). Application and performance impact of stage–gate systems: The role services in the firm’s business focus. R&D Management, 49(4), 534–554.
47. Schultz, C., Salomo, S., de Brentani, U., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2013). How formal control influences decision-making clarity and innovation performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(3), 430–447.
48. Smolnik, T., & Bergmann, T. (2020). Structuring and managing the new product development process: Review on the evolution of the Stage-Gate process. Journal of Business Chemistry, 17(1), 41–57.
49. Soenksen, L. R., & Yazdi, Y. (2017). Stage-gate process for life sciences and medical innovation investment. Technovation, 62, 14–21.
50. Tian, X. (2011). The causes and consequences of venture capital stage financing. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(1), 132–159.
51. Tian, X., & Wang, T. Y. (2014). Tolerance for failure and corporate innovation. Review of Financial Studies, 27(1), 211–255.
52. The world bank. (2023). World Bank Group Country Survey 2023. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog?page=1&sk=PROJECT%20MANAGEMENT&sort_by=rank&sort_order=desc&ps=15
53. Wang, S., & Zhou, H. (2004). Staged financing in venture capital: Moral hazard and risks. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(1), 131–155.
54. van der Duin, P. A., Ortt, J. R., & Aarts, W. T. (2014). Contextual innovation management using a Stage-Gate platform: The case of Philips shaving and beauty. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 489–500.
55. von Zedtwitz, M., Friesike, S., & Gassmann, O. (2014). Managing R&D and new product development. In M. Dodgson, D. M. Gann, N., Phillips (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management (pp. 530–547). Oxford University Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
.png)
